What you need to know
- Gemini Flash 2.0 has expanded its features to more people, providing access to its image generation function and more.
- Reddit users have found a clever way to get rid of the filigrane of the images downloaded via Getty Images, Shutterstock, etc.
- Gemini removes the original filigree on the image; However, he leaves a tiny in the lower left corner of the image.
Google announced a multitude of features that will be available for more people via Gemini Flash 2.0, last week. One of them was the ability to Experience with the generation of images. This function was presented in December, and now the developers can test this new capacity by using an “experimental version of Gemini 2.0 Flash” via AI Studio.
This model allows users to give Gemini an prompt, and it can generate illustrated images of a story and give you a detailed recipe of a dish that you plan to make, accompanied by real recipe illustrations. He can also generate images with text rendering that could be useful for people who wish to use them in social networks.
That said, it seems that it was something much more clever than we had realized that we needed so far. A post Reddit has highlighted the possibility of removing the filigrane on images via this new experimental feature (as first identified by Technological crunch).
Gemini are good enough to eliminate the filigranes Since R / Singularity
As shown in a series of images on the post Reddit above, the user has downloaded an image filled with filigranes on the latest gemini model and tried to delete the watermark. This led to a clearer image free from unnecessary filigranes; However, Gemini left his logo on the image generated, ensuring that people knew that the image in question had been published.
He did the same thing with the images of Shutterstock, Istock and Getty Images, Plate-Forms which require subscription costs to rid of the images of their watermark. Depending on the publication, Gemini 2.0 Flash seems to fight with certain semi-transparent filigranes and filigranes that cause the big portions of images.
That said, the removal of the watermark without consent is illegal and could attract the person or the organization that does so in unnecessary prosecution. On another post X with filigranes that are deleted from Getty images, a user said this morning (March 17) that they were no longer able to generate waterproof images on the studio.
This suggests that Google could have noticed the growing trend of people who do this and disconnected this specific prompt.
Android Central has contacted Google on the above, and we will update this article once we have more information.
