Trump would have watched participation in Binance.us
There are rumors that the Trump family is in talks to acquire participation in Binance.us, the American branch of the exchange of world digital currencies. But below the surface, this potential agreement seems to be more than a simple commercial transaction – it could have significant political and personal motivations behind it.
According to reports, the owner and former CEO of the majority of Binance, Changpeng Zhao, sought presidential grace. This raises questions about the question of whether the participation proposed by the Trump family in Binance.us is part of a wider negotiation to ensure this grace.
From Trump’s point of view, an agreement like this aligned with the push of its administration to position the United States as a global cryptocurial center. Over the years, he has signed decrees to advance the industry, publicly expressed support for companies related to crypto and even launched his own cryptographic products, including the same. Appropriate a major exchange like Binance.
However, such a decision raises ethical concerns. If Trump was to have participation in Binance.us while simultaneously shaping policies that have an impact on cryptocurrency exchanges, this could lead to initiate negotiation allegations – a problem which, unfortunately, has become common in the cryptography industry this year.
For CZ, the security of a forgiveness would be transformer. His 2023 guilt advocacy for violating the American anti-flowage laws (LAM) has imposed significant restrictions on his ability to carry out business. Being a condemned criminal limits his ability to obtain investments, guaranteeing operational licenses and developing in certain jurisdictions, including the United States, an agreement with the Trump family could be his way of overcoming these obstacles and reconstructing the Binance Empire.
However, after the breakdown of history, CZ went to social networks, denying any discussion on a binance. In an article on X (formerly Twitter), CZ said that the Original report of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) was wrong, declaring: “I had no discussion on a binance with whom will face us … Well, anyone.”
Although this can be a real denial, there is always the possibility that this response is part of a broader communication strategy to withdraw the agreement from the public radar. It is also possible that discussions occur but did not progress as CZ hoped, taking him to close the rumors publicly. On the contrary, CZ could simply tell the truth, and the nature of the conversations between the Trump family and the binance could have been entirely different from what was initially reported.
This is one of those cases when time will really tell us because if Binance receives investments or CZ gets forgiveness, we are very likely to hear about it, even if the former CEO of Binance would prefer so that these offers fly under the radar.
The Bitcoin Strategic Reserve of the United States invites changes in global cryptography policy
Last week, the United States signed an executive decree establishing a national BTC strategic reserve. Although the market continues to pour out despite this news, this decision marks a step towards traditional acceptance of cryptocurrency.
The impact of this decision is already felt worldwide. Shortly after the American announcement, China and Russia adjusted their positions on digital assets. The Chinese government clarified This cryptocurrency property is legal, while the Central Bank of Russia announcement that it would allow investors to buy digital assets under specific conditions.
This reaction highlights the role of the theory of geopolitical games in the evolution of digital finance. No country wants to be lagging behind in a sector that could be essential to shape the future of global financial systems. When the United States takes a daring step like storage of bitcoin, other nations, in particular its competitors, feel obliged to follow the step to remain competitive.
At the national level, the American government has taken measures to make the country a more attractive environment for cryptocurrency companies. Under the Biden administration, regulatory uncertainty and aggressive application measures have kept many companies in a detention model, or worse, forced them to close their operations. But now, with a more user -friendly approach in crypto, we see a relaxation of regulations, clearer political frameworks and an industry that is free to innovate and experiment.
3 crypto moves from the US government this week
This week, the US government has taken three measures that may have a significant impact on cryptocurrency companies based in the United States:
1. The house votes to overthrow
In a 292-132 voteThe House of Representatives adopted a resolution reversing the controversial broker rule of decentralized finance (DEFI) of the broker’s rule. Initially implemented on December 30, 2024, under the Biden administration, this rule expanded the definition of “broker” to include the DEFI platforms, forcing them to collect and declare the user transaction data.
The leaders of the cryptographic industry have rejected, arguing that the rule was not only difficult to implement given the anonymous nature of the portfolio addresses, but also an excessive excess which could suffocate innovation. Now that the room has voted to repeal it, he will now go to the Senate for another vote before finally landing on the president’s office for the final failure.
2. The executive order of Trump to facilitate the banking restrictions of cryptography
Trump will prepare to sign a decree aimed at reducing the restrictions that make it difficult for cryptocurrency companies to access traditional banking services. If it is adopted, it would be another pro-Crypto move from the Trump administration, strengthening the idea that the United States undertakes to become a world leader in digital asset innovation.
For years, cryptographic companies have struggled to guarantee reliable banking partnerships due to regulatory concerns, in particular those linked to know your client (KYC), AML and risk management. The relaxation of these restrictions could create new opportunities, allowing cryptographic companies to take advantage of the advantages of having a stable banking partner in the traditional financial world which could help them to integrate and offer their services in the wider economy.
3. Dry to abandon the registration rule of the proposed cryptographic trading system
In another regulatory change, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seems to withdraw from a proposal that would have forced cryptographic companies to register as trading systems. During the international banker conference, the SEC commissioner, Mark Uyeda, said that he had asked the SEC personnel to abandon this part of the proposal that was initially proposed in 2022.
This also indicates a distance from the aggressive regulatory position under the former president of the SEC, Gary Gensler, who was pressure for broader surveillance in the cryptography sector. If the SEC officially abandons the rule, it would remove another regulatory obstacle which has stifled cryptographic companies.
These three developments, it does not matter if they have been finalized or are still in motion, indicate the same trend: the American government actively makes the country a more attractive place for cryptocurrency companies to do business.
With less regulatory paperwork, fewer legal threats and policies designed to encourage innovation rather than stifling it, the United States tries to position itself as a dominant force in the global economy of cryptography.
Watch: Reggie Middleton on Defi, Booms / Busts & Crypto Regulation
https://www.youtube.com/watch? Title = “YouTube Video Player” Frameborder = “0” Allow = “Acceleromment; autoplay; clipboard-twri; Encrypted-Media; Gyroscope; Image-In-Picture; Web-Share” Retrmerpolicy = “Strict-Origine-Ohen-Cross-Ovin” Alowlscreen = “”>
